> Hi Maggie, It's Reggie and I'm feelig compelled to
answer this letter. I clearly have a negligible
investment in the whole affair (compared to the two of
you)and so the simple fact that I'm writing to you so
personally may resonante with your whole callous mike
edifice in a way that will render this letter useless
in regards to it's intent. The genuine central intent
and impetus of this letter is to continue to be
micheal and yours freind in the manner in which I
conduct these sort of nontraditional freindships
which, if it's what you need, you can just disregard
as more kryptonite from planet mike. Of course a
lesser part of my compulsion is a kind of amusing
prose challenge but I want to be clear that I am not
making light of you. I really find you impressive and
intimadating. I'll finish this preface by saying that
this really is the sort of thing that i say to my
girl-freinds which you are ofcrourse free not to be.
I really suspect that to some degree you've created a
bit of a cartoon of yourself and mike for (or maybe
more accurately with help from) your boyfriend (see
your own paragraph seven). An even more partial and
reductionist narrative might read like: Young innocent
corn-fed Texan falls for sharp eastern pomo boy and,
to her suprise, get's totally pomo'd. Girl sticks it
out for as long as her blue blood pumping heart can
stand and then with a broken heart returns to original
wholesomeness. I am certainly not trying to somehow
cover for the fact that Mike can be a remarkably
insolent prick and you'd have to get in line to say
it. Nor am I going to hide the fact that I've sat and
marveled at how you acivated the rather sizable potion
of mike who explicitly wanted nothing more than to
spend his whole fucking life with you and whose
primary functions were to try to wrap his mind around
how fucking dope he beleived you to be and how on
earth he could continue to keep you interested. I
don't have anything to do (except for my own
investment in mike which began long after his
"desease")with you and mike's relationship politics or
psycho/bio germ warfare or whatever. What I'm
concerned with really is the Jenny jones level of
testemonial cartharsis you seem to be looking for. I
honestly think that it is more than dangerous to take
a year and a half of your life with someone who you
cared about and who (even if he wasn't prince
charming) was unquestionably stimulating and with whom
you expirienced and processed alot of
extra-relationship stimulation. I'm know you're smart
enough to realize that on some level you are just
sacrificing your old realtionship to your new one
although I'm not sure that you're considering the fact
that if 'James the noble and pure of heart' doesn't
work out you'll just have two bloated corpses in your
head. I mean do you really feel comfortable accusing
someone of having taken advantage of your innocence?
Are you not even a little bit aware of just how much
your making mike your "chauffere" fed the exact
liberal progressive pomo sex monster that you've
decided is all of him? He thaught you were such a
badass. You actually inspired him to new hieghts. He
told me about your professional expiriment while
attempting to squash me for insisting to devil
advocate that you were just a really hip effective
shell for alot of bourgoise insipid values and that
you were gonna turn him into a castrated wack
professor. From the outside, regardless of the
interior politics, your massive outrage at his night
of casual seedy sex with a bar patron, when coupled
with the young courtesan thing, seems really
suspicious. Aren't we projecting a little? Aren't we
maybe trying to kill a few too many birds with one
stoner? Do you really need to kill the birds (for
james?)? Sure mikes emotionally irresponsible but it
certainly takes one to know one. If your letter to
mike was really just about hurting his feelings that's
totally fine and it worked. If it wasn't then I must
regrettably inform you that that's not what healing
looks like. Guy makes you walk home in the rain, dump
him. Totally fine. Your boots were made for walking.
But I've seen you on this "sick and deseased" side of
the matrix and you were totally plugged in. You were
not part of some year and a half long date rape. As
far as I can tell you put on as good of a show as
anyone else and you should own it because even if it
hurt it was totally awesome. James is the opiate of
the masses and opium is also totally awesome. Do you
know what I'm saying? I realise that this has
degenrated into some kind of rolling stone new age
shit but I really mean it. I beleive you owe it to
yourself, even if you never speak to mike again, to
get to a place where you can appreciate your time with
him. I'm sure it was probably for the most part
beautiful and rare. He is only partially stupid and
sick just like the rest of us. an he should have the
right to attempt to love someone else without having
it tainted by only partially astute pathos ridden
statements about his capacity to love. I highly doubt
that you just did fiona any favors. O.K. That's it
from mike's (and still sincerely your) idiot hypocrite
friend. How are you anyway, besides all that?
reggie:
I was wondering if I would get to hear from michael about this. I didn't think so, but you? That's entirely unexpected.
I don't really know how to respend to you about this note. I kind of want to argue with you and say things like "point one, the new relationship has nothing to do with the old one. i've been friends with james since i was 13.." or something like that.
But i actually don't want to argue with you abou my relationship with michael. You live on that same planet that he does. I think you also have some kind of crazy influence over him that I really do not care to understand.
As for the place michael has in my heart...Blahblah...
The letter to Mike was about how I do not want to be his friend. I'm not prepared to hang out with him and Fiona and all his cool new friends in portland. I'm not prepared to hear him dis James (as he does on the phone with me) or judge what I choose to do. And really, that's all I ever feel when I'm with him: critiqued and essentially judged. This isn't some poor self-esteem woe-is-maggie thing either. I feel fine around scores of other people. Boys even. Boys I'm involved with even.
As for his cheating on me. Please take note: we had an agreement not to sleep with other people (herpes anyone? anyone?). And he did. That was awful and made me not trust him one iota. Well, that and the rather sneaky way he managed to monopolize all my time by insisting that he could at ANY moment run off and stick his dick anywhere he wanted. Whatever. It was a childish relationship. As for him wanting to spend the rest of his life with me. Sure. Fine. Whatever. He's already transfered that to Fiona and that's fine. His feelings have much less to do with the person than the fact that someone's around, eating up his amaaaaazing intelect and deeeeeep thoughts. Right. I'm just not impressed anymore.
And If it hurt his feelings, that's real sad. I'm sorry about that. I don't want to hurt Michael. but the last time we spoke on the phone, in case he hasn't filled you in on this yet (as you seem to know everything else about me, kid), he told me I should go ahead and yell at him anytime if I was still mad. And I am, and I did.
So, excuse the sass in this letter, but you got me a little irritated. Blueblooded girl from texas, eh? I think you underestimate me, and I think you've already put me a teeny tiny little cubbyhole, but then, i suppose that prolly makes it easier for you.
Other than this drama, which is not what I intended it to be, I'm excellent. It's a little cold in the Northeast, but that's alright with me. I've been skinning baby seals and wearing their fur to keep warm. Oh, wait. That's just the cartoon version of me. Excuse.
Maggie
i'm learning about
words for the day
current state
over - 2006-02-20
shiny. - 2006-01-23
grown up day - 2006-01-17
canvas - 2006-01-11
pen? pencil? maybe blood... - 2006-01-09